Sign in
Contact
Interviews
Media
Help
Hilfe (Deutsch)
Help (English)
Ayuda (Espanol)
Status
About
Upload your thesis
Search history
Search single citation
Advanced search
Home
Sign in
New here? Register
Forgot password?
Data sheet
Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students Using a Virtual Patient Simulator
Abdulnour, R.
[2]
O'Rourke, M.
Smith, T.
[12]
Diagnosis, 2023/05, 10(2):A3-A4. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0006, type of study: ,css,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Full text
(https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2023-0006/html)
Keywords:
clinical reasoning
[85]
congress
[77]
cross sectional study
[894]
diagnosis
[412]
medical students
[694]
osteopathic medicine
[2109]
Abstract:
Background: - NEJM Healer is a computer-based simulator using illness script theory to enhance the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning. - During a virtual patient encounter, learners must select data, write problem representations, build a differential diagnosis, and propose a management plan - After the encounter, learners perform informed self-assessments of their problem representations, management plan, and level of confidence in their lead diagnosis. - They are given formative assessment on their lead diagnostic accuracy, differential diagnostic accuracy (DDxA), and illness script concordance. - Educators can view all the feedback data in the NEJM Healer Educator Portal, including informed self-assessment of problem representations, management plan, and level of confidence. Objectives: - To augment deliberate practice for over 1100 medical students at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine (LECOM) dispersed across several campuses. - To compare performance in NEJM Healer with learner clinical experience in a cross-sectional analysis. Results: - Normalized data was used to support early identification of learners who could use additional support for developing clinical reasoning skills using a defined framework. - Comparative cross-sectional analysis of all encounters showed that pre-clerkship students spent significantly more time per encounter and had significantly lower diagnostic accuracy than post-clerkship students. - In one encounter of medium-difficulty, DDxA was significantly lower after history-taking than after physical exam and review of diagnostic interventions (Fig. 1). DDxA of pre-clerkship students was significantly lower than post-clerkship students at every stage of the encounter. - Post-clerkship students were significantly more confident of their diagnosis than pre-clerkship students. - Diagnostic accuracy in NEJM Healer significantly but weakly correlated with NBOME COMLEX-USA Level 2 CE test scores. Conclusion: - Performance in NEJM Healer identified students who could use additional support for developing clinical reasoning skills. - Clinical reasoning performance in NEJM Healer correlated with clinical-student experience level. - While differential diagnostic accuracy was significantly correlated with COMLEX Level-2 CE scores in this large sample size, very little of the variation between students was predicted by their knowledge test scores, indicating that clinical reasoning requires a distinct set of skills in addition to clinical knowledge.
•
Impressum
•
Legal notice
•
Datenschutz
•
ostlib.de/data_xguecyqmbjpfntvdswza
Supported by
OSTLIB recommends
Home
Advanced search
Search single citation
Search history
Help
Hilfe (Deutsch)
Help (English)
Ayuda (Espanol)
Status
About
Upload your thesis
Media
Interviews
Contact
Impressum
Legal notice
Datenschutz
Sign in
Forgot password
Register / Registrierung / Inscripción