Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 2025/03, 33(2):149–157. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2438196, type of study: ,css,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Full text    (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10669817.2024.2438196)

Keywords:

cross sectional study [894]
diagnosis [412]
New Zealand [39]
OMT [3924]
osteopathic manipulative treatment [3945]
osteopaths [269]
thoracic spine [98]
upper back pain [2]

Abstract:

Background Manual therapy is routinely used in the management of upper back pain (UBP), a disabling condition. However, the approach to diagnosis and treatment techniques used by manipulative physiotherapists and osteopaths is largely unknown. Objectives To explore knowledge about UBP, including diagnosis and treatment, by New Zealand (NZ) osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists and to investigate differences (if any) in the self-reported approaches to diagnosis and management of UBP between the professions. Design A cross-sectional survey administered through an online platform (Qualtrics) between September 2023 and January 2024. Participants One hundred and ten NZ osteopaths and manipulative physiotherapists completed the survey. Results Forty-eight percent (n = 53) of respondents identified their profession as physiotherapists and 52% (n = 57) as osteopaths. Over three-quarters of respondents (77%) ‘strongly agreed’ that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. Osteopaths were significantly more likely to often proffer ‘wear and tear/degeneration’ (p < 0.01) and ‘visceral referred pain’ (p = 0.02) as the cause of a patient’s UBP. In terms of management, osteopaths were significantly more likely to use soft tissue techniques (p < 0.01), spinal manipulations (p < 0.01), rib manipulations (p < 0.01), rib mobilizations (p < 0.01), and visceral techniques (p < 0.01), compared to physiotherapists. Conclusions The survey highlights a strong consensus among respondents that a multimodal approach is essential for effective UBP management. The survey also identified profession-specific approaches to the diagnosis and management of UBP. Future research using qualitative methods is required to further explore these profession-specific differences and explore outcomes of care.