Sign in
Contact
Interviews
Media
Help
Hilfe (Deutsch)
Help (English)
Ayuda (Espanol)
Status
About
Upload your thesis
Search history
Search single citation
Advanced search
Home
Sign in
New here? Register
Forgot password?
Data sheet
What complementary and alternative medicine therapy recommendations exist across clinical practice guidelines for low back pain? A systematic review
Mohiuddin, U.
[1]
Ng, J.
[40]
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, 2023/06, 20(2):eA43. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2020-2120, type of study: ,sr,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Full text
(https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2020-2120/html)
Keywords:
conference abstract
[127]
low back pain
[524]
OMT
[3925]
osteopathic manipulative treatment
[3946]
practice guidelines
[19]
systematic review
[445]
Abstract:
Background: Approximately 13% of Americans suffer from low backpain (LBP), of which 4 0% use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for its treatment and/or management. Despite this high prevalence, no resource systematically summarizes CAM-related recommendations across clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of LBP for the benefit of the clinician. Objectives: In this study, we 1) identified all CPGs that make CAM-related recommendations and 2) summarized them in a single review. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify LBP treatment/management CPGs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched, along with the Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites, to identify English-language CPGs published from 2008-2018. Two reviewers screened for guidelines that made CAM-related recommendations and completed data extraction of the types of C AM therapies and strengths of recommendations. Results: Of 181 unique search results, 22 LBP CPGs were found, 17 of which made mention of C AM therapies. Recommendations relating to CAM were made in all 17 guidelines, and included (number of recommendations in total; for/against/uncertain): spinal manipulation (13; 10/0/3), acupuncture (10; 4/1/5), massage therapy (7; 5/0/2), manual therapy (6; 4/0/2), yoga (2; 1/0/1), tai chi (2; 1/0/1), osteopathic manipulative treatment (1; 1/0/0), herbal therapy (1; 0/0/1) and homeopathic therapy (1; 0/0/1). Conclusions The majority of LBP guidelines made CAM recommendations. Most guidelines provided a recommendation to offer spinal manipulation whereas there is uncertainty regarding offering acupuncture as a potential C AM treatment. The remaining therapies, which included massage/manual therapy, yoga, tai chi, osteopathy, herbs, and homeopathy, were not commonly evaluated or recommended across this subset of CPGs. This difference in recommended C AM therapies may be due to a higher prevalence of use of spinal manipulation and acupuncture which reflect a greater body of research in comparison to the other C AM therapies.
•
Impressum
•
Legal notice
•
Datenschutz
•
ostlib.de/data_khjnetypdbwaugvqxmcz
Supported by
OSTLIB recommends
Home
Advanced search
Search single citation
Search history
Help
Hilfe (Deutsch)
Help (English)
Ayuda (Espanol)
Status
About
Upload your thesis
Media
Interviews
Contact
Impressum
Legal notice
Datenschutz
Sign in
Forgot password
Register / Registrierung / Inscripción